Comments on: Big Brother 14 Runner-Up Dan Gheesling Interview

By: Micky Mcbee

Micky Mcbee — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:55:00 +0000

After jury polls only attract sore losers.

The fact that Dan tried to drag Jenn to F2 showed he was not that good at the game. Dan FAILED! Ian got all the people out he said he wanted out. Ian won the game, Ian won the jury.

By: Micky Mcbee

Micky Mcbee — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:50:00 +0000

Dr. Will still rules, even predicted the winner, Ian Terry!

By: Lea Armstrong

Lea Armstrong — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:55:00 +0000

This is the nature of the game. You take the risk when you play dirty and you also take the risk when you are a floater. There is no one way of going about winning this game. You either win because you won the most physical and won the most competitions or you win because you played a better social game. Very rarely does someone win because of both. You stand the risk of alienating those other HG’s who are trying for the same money as you are and the only difference in whether or not they win or you win is if you can convince them that you were the better player. Obviously Dan isn’t that convincing and yes, they may have voted based on emotions but Ian played on those emotions…and ultimately, as we already know, he won. So, did he deserve to win? Yes, he did because his game play was just as good but in a different way. Not only that…Dan didn’t really get his hands, “bloody” as he stated. Someone else had that blood on their hands and it was mostly Ian. Dan was dirty, don’t get me wrong, but most of the hacking was done by someone else. Dan thought he could score points that way and ultimately led to him not winning.

By: Thomas Georgetown

Thomas Georgetown — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:12:00 +0000

That is true but some might hope they would consider the game play and not the nicest clothes someone brought.

By: Thomas Georgetown

Thomas Georgetown — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:11:00 +0000

Push come to shove, Shane for sure and Frank didn’t really know how to play the game. Boogie played for Frank and he floundered once Boogie was gone. Shane could only shake his head yes to whomever he was talking to at the moment. I am not saying he didn’t, but did he ever have a single thought he came up with?

By: Thomas Georgetown

Thomas Georgetown — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:07:00 +0000

Who didn’t play like they were on your side? Frank did it, Ian did it. Joe was one of the worse doing it, etc.

By: Nina Bohm

Nina Bohm — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:16:00 +0000

Dan is a good player or he wouldn’t have gotten to the F2. He got to the end with cunning, outwitting the others and backstabbing as needed because he could not rely on competitions. Ian needed comps to win. Without shark veto and F5 HOH, Ian’s game would have been over. He also needed Dan to scumbag Shane in order to stay in the game. Ian did nothing to fight to stay F4 week after he lost that veto. Ian played a good game but it wasn’t amazing. Dan played a great game to get to final 2. The funeral and deal with Frank/Jenn kept him in the game when his game was all but over. The others also didn’t bother to try to take him out after that. Ian benefitted that Dan wanted an F2 deal with him. Dan benefitted from Ian’s loyalty so they both benefitted from each other. Ian had friends on the jury (Britney and Ashley) and three bitter sore loser jurors (Frank, Shane, and Joe). Dan also won already so Jenn flipped too.

By: dmil

dmil — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:13:00 +0000

Janelle is a loser just like Dan!

By: dmil

dmil — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:09:00 +0000

If Dan was such a great player, he wouldn’t have lost by a landslide!

By: Jacee2

Jacee2 — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:26:00 +0000

Paul I agree with you. Each jury has the right to vote the way they want. Just because Dan didn’t win now the jury is at fault. Dan should have thought about the end game and obviously did not. When you stab people in the back and you end up losing because of that it is not the jury’s fault it is your own for not thinking about that very important part of the game. Also, Jenn voted because she wanted a new person to win. Again, her right as a jury member to vote for who she wants and for whatever reason she wants.