Comments on: Big Brother 13 Week 8: HoH Competition Results

By: nooneyoucare about

nooneyoucare about — Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:30:34 +0000

Jordan hasn’t lied

By: MKepy

MKepy — Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:32:22 +0000

Did anyone actually SEE Jeff (unknowingly) toss the shoe on the side?? Was he on the end on purpose? Could it be that shoe was never in his bin and someone from production tossed it into his discard mix from behind? Conspiracy theories abound.

By: ora

ora — Sun, 28 Aug 2011 20:46:52 +0000

shirley why are you downing kalia so bad? she has played a much better game than you. she has also played and won competitions and hasnt ate any more food than anyone else. lay off, give credit where it is due

By: David

David — Sun, 28 Aug 2011 17:12:56 +0000

My prediction: Rachel will win and have Brendan’s baby soon after.

By: Big Brother 13 Episode 23: Week 8 Nomination Show Tonight | Big Brother Network

Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:33:43 +0000

[...] Julie Chen and company to deliver the latest BB13 news then you can go ahead and take a peek at the HoH competition results and HoH nomination spoilers. Then there’s the whole Pandora’s Box twist to unravel if [...]

By: squareangel

squareangel — Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:00:34 +0000

I am still trying to figure how casey anthony and Shelley Moore are comparitable….enlighten me would you

By: squareangel

squareangel — Sun, 28 Aug 2011 08:54:24 +0000

Adam was handed the POV (corn hole game)…Jeff threw it to allow Adam to have a win…..

By: Doug

Doug — Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:18:53 +0000

The comments of many on the FB pages about Shelly, and on other forums such as this one; speaks just as loudly about the nature of the person posting such comments as does how Shelly and other players play the game.
Many of the comments are not comments – they are ad hominem; personal attacks, judgements based on assumptions, and slander against her and her family – and those are really uncalled for.
The few that are legit point to the fact that what she did was a dumb move; not intelligent game play. She screwed her own game over; and most likely won’t win now, and did damage to her reputation beyond the game.
That much I agree with.
But venomous commentary, more cruel than anything else – why? What’s the point? And does her family – especially her daughter – deserve to get that kind of feedback from people (aka: jerks)? Is it fair that a child has to hear and be tanuted about her mother?
I’m sure she’s not happy with her mother bladding Jeff/Jordan either. She might do what they tell her – say it was just a game move – and that she supports her mother; but she likely doesn’t believe that.

None the less, there really is no call for such statements; and FB should shut such pages down when the descend into too much garbage commentary.

Being upset with Shelly’s behaviour is one thing; stating you don’t back her or expect her to win is equal; but violent attacks are unnecessary; and really immature.

By: Doug

Doug — Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:14:57 +0000

Sadly you are confirming what I have been saying. Your actions in the game go far beyond the game.
More sadly, too many aren’t cluing in.

Shelly, and her family, will have to endure this for sometime. Eventually another person will come along; make an equally unthoughtout, unethical action, and take the heat away from her/them.

The one I really feel for is her daughter – who will be the one to take the brunt of this. The trauma she’s going to be – in fact probably is – subjected to could take years and more than $500,000 in therapy to deal with. I would not be surprised to have the media report that Shelly and her family moved to parts unknown if things don’t settle soon.

By: Doug

Doug — Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:51:17 +0000

I would agree Jeff isn’t as ethical as he was before. Maybe it’s the pressure he was feeling, hard to say. Doesn’t make it right though.

And perhaps part of the game is lying and back-stabbing; but again, one’s actions reach out beyond the game. If they didn’t your argument might stand, but the fact is they do. All those players are under a microscope and are being judged; and many of those judgements are public.
Likely many who watch BB also watch Survivor. I can’t count how many people have said that after watching Russell they’d never want to do business with him. Yes, he’s a great player, they say, but he’s corrupt; and they could never trust a deal with him.
And that’s the point. Like Survivor, and other public games, your way of playing has a way of catching up to you outside of the game.
And it’s not just games, it’s all facets of life.
Tiger Woods, for example. The Governator for another.

Jeff started out like the old Jeff, but as the game progressed he’d become increasingly erratic. Same with several others. Is it right? No.

The only two I can see being deservant are Kalia and Jordan; as they are the only two who’ve played with any semblance of sincerity to their word.

And BTW – Jeff could, and should, have won POV over Porsche. If you noticed when he was tossing colored balls out of the bin he threw a shoe out and did not notice; then found one and returned back to his bin. The shoe was right there, along the side of his bin. Porsche then found her second one. Had he looked he’d have seen it, and won; and it’d be a whole different final 6 in that case.